Posted by: commonsresource | February 24, 2010

The double-edged sword of enforcement

At the same time that the OSS community is understandably celebrating the resolution of the Jacobsen case and pouring over the associated settlement documents, many of the same people have been “wringing their hands” about the recently announced patent cross-license agreement between Microsoft and Amazon.  Since the Microsoft Amazon agreement appears to cover, among other things, the use of open source software in the Kindle e-reader, the announcement has sparked a major debate (well summarized in today’s IT Blogwatch) as to whether it is an significant endorsement of Microsoft’s assertion that Linux and other OSS technologies infringe more than 200 of its patents.

While I do not wish to enter into this debate, I do find it curious that many individuals are simultaneously celebrating the triumph of the copyright regime in the Jacobsen case and rueing the “apparently” successful assertion of patents against Linux.  Since the OSS movement is, at its core, a creative licensing initiative with intellectual property as its very foundation, it is time for the community to adopt a more consistent approach.  While I am well aware of the many challenges that software patents bring to the OSS movement, it is time for the OSS community to come together to unleash its awesome creativity to address and overcome these challenges in a constructive and healthy manner that respects the double-edged sword of enforcement.


Responses

  1. […] giving “due consideration to the value of intellectual creation”.  As discussed in my “The double-edged sword of enforcement” post, I believe that commercial software and OSS are both built on an IP foundation and a shared […]

  2. […] patents. As I continue to see this rift as a somewhat false dichotomy for the reasons set out in my earlier post, I commend Ed Bott for his Ogg versus the world: don’t fall for open-source FUD post on his […]

  3. […] potentially significant threat to the movement itself that needs to be addressed.  As I said in my The double-edged sword of enforcement post back in […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: